Leaderboard/Research/qinyan-academic-skills
Last commit on March 9, 2026·Created on February 27, 2026

LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills

A comprehensive toolkit for structured data extraction and synthesis in academic research
Combined rank
#348
across all skills
In Research
#21
category rank
Stars
906
+2.6% in last 7d
Forks
76
0.0% in last 7d
Watchers
4
0.0% in last 7d
Traction scoreGitHub stars can be faked, so popularity alone can be misleading. Traction Score looks for broader signs of recent attention, adoption, and active maintenance.
TL;DR

This collection provides specialized utilities for academic researchers conducting literature reviews and evidence synthesis. It streamlines the process of searching scientific papers and retrieving granular experimental data—such as sample sizes, quality scores, and methodology—that often remains hidden in full-text studies.

WHO IT'S FOR
Academic researchers
conducting literature reviews and evidence synthesis
Life sciences researchers
searching bioRxiv preprints for latest findings
Scientific writers
generating and validating BibTeX citations
Bioinformatics and drug discovery specialists
extracting structured experimental data from studies
Repository contents

187 skill files

Compatible AgentsThe repository documents support for these agents. The skills may also work with other agents that can load SKILL.md files, but they may need some setup or small changes.

Use this skill collection

Follow the documented setup, then try a first task.

I’m using

Install the complete collection globally for Claude Code

Installs: Complete Qinyan Academic Skills collection; the listed paths are a bounded selection from the documented five-skill Nature-style suite. · Claude Code

Before you start
  • Bash
  • Git
  • curl

Platform: On Windows, run the installer in WSL or Git Bash.

  1. Run this command in a terminal. The default destination is Claude Code's global skills directory.

    curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills/main/install.sh | bash
README.md · Checked Sep 18, 2026

Give it something to do.

Suggested first task

Build a claim–evidence outline for one manuscript section

Uses qinyan-nature-writing

  • The target manuscript section
  • Verified results, figures, tables, experimental notes, or evidence pointers
  • The intended audience and target journal, if known
  • The desired word limit or delivery format
Use the qinyan-nature-writing skill on the supplied manuscript materials. For one specified section, produce only a concise argument spine, a claim–evidence map, and a three-paragraph outline. Identify unsupported claims or missing facts as AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED; do not invent results, references, mechanisms, statistics, or journal policies.
Suggested first task

Polish one academic paragraph with fidelity checks

Uses qinyan-nature-polishing

  • One existing Chinese or English academic paragraph
  • Its manuscript section and intended audience
  • Target journal and word limit, if applicable
  • Any facts, terminology, numbers, or citation meanings that must remain unchanged
Use the qinyan-nature-polishing skill in its default annotated mode to polish the supplied paragraph. Return the revised paragraph, the key structural or language edits, scientific-meaning risks, and any AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED items. Preserve every number, unit, comparison direction, citation intention, and scientific qualification; do not strengthen correlation into causation or a trend into significance.
Suggested first task

Review one manuscript subsection for its highest-priority concerns

Uses qinyan-nature-review

  • The manuscript subsection as text or Markdown
  • Any figures, tables, data, or methods referenced by that subsection
  • The manuscript's core claim and intended audience, if known
  • A clear note identifying any materials that were not supplied
Use the qinyan-nature-review skill for a focused pre-submission review of the supplied subsection. State the input boundary, then report no more than three highest-priority concerns. For each concern, include a stable Concern ID, Issue key, severity, claim pointer, evidence pointer, why it matters, and a verifiable resolution test. Mark unavailable evidence as NOT_LOCATABLE and do not predict acceptance or invent reviewer identities, experiments, sources, or manuscript details.