counterfactual-reasoning
Trigger this skill when you need to assess how legal outcomes would differ if a given fact, act, or condition did not exist or were altered. Typical trigger scenarios include: causation determinations (whether harm would still have occurred without the act), allocation of fault and liability shares, delimiting the scope of damages, calculating contract breach losses, hypothetical legality tests for administrative acts, assessing interruption of criminal causation, and legislative impact assessment. The core method is to construct a 'counterfactual world' that differs from the actual world only
Try your first task
A source-grounded starter task has not been verified for this skill yet.
Inside SKILL.md
965 linesSection content has not been verified for this skill yet.
Full source remains withheld under the current source-display policy. Read the author’s source ↗