ts-paper-review

Adversarial peer-review HARDENING pass for a ts-paper draft — the thing a forward-only drafter/refiner can't do: argue the other side of the paper's claims. Distilled from PaperJury into a lean Claude-native engine: N isolated domain reviewers read the whole paper (verbatim-quote anti-skim) → merge/dedupe → perspective-diverse skeptics try to refute each issue → loop-until-dry → a prioritized, verified issue list, which is fixed through the refine stage (each fix bound to a close_criterion) and re-linted. Run after refine (before figure/latex), or whenever the user asks to "review / critique /

Try your first task

Run an adversarial draft review

Start a fresh conversation.

Use ts-paper-review to critique the complete paper draft I provide. Run the default three-lens hardening pass and return a prioritized verified issue list in which every issue has an exact evidence quote, severity, and close criterion. Do not edit the draft yet. Draft: <paste or provide the complete paper draft here>.

Required inputs

A complete paper draft replacing `<paste or provide the complete paper draft here>`
Whether the draft is in proposal or data-aware mode

Suggested template by Skill Leaderboard, grounded in the linked source. Task evidence ↗

Inside SKILL.md

154 lines

Section content has not been verified for this skill yet.

Full source remains withheld under the current source-display policy. Read the author’s source ↗