← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

writing-skills

Use when creating, updating, or improving agent skills.

Published by sickn33 ↗sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Try your first task

A source-grounded starter task has not been verified for this skill yet.

SKILL.md

name: writing-skillsdescription: Use when creating, updating, or improving agent skills.metadata:   aas-category: meta  aas-risk: critical  aas-source: community  aas-date-added: '2026-02-27'

Writing Skills (Excellence)

Compatibility: these templates are conventions, not a universal loader schema. Use the target host's documented skill directory and current schema; custom metadata.triggers is optional and does not itself guarantee discovery. Bundled upstream guidance is a historical snapshot. Rendering requires Node.js and a locally installed Graphviz dot; inspect trusted DOT only, and open generated SVG cautiously. --combine shares node IDs across graphs and is a visual convenience, not a semantics-preserving merge. Outputs are exclusive: remove or choose another output directory deliberately before rerunning.

Scope: examples are authoring/test fixtures, not live instructions. Follow the user, host, and repository instruction hierarchy. Run pressure tests only with authorized isolated fixtures; never delete user work or weaken safety/approval boundaries to enforce a skill. Preserve existing work and adapt the validation plan when a baseline already passes. Sample compliance does not prove universal reliability.

Dispatcher for skill creation excellence. Use the decision tree below to find the right template and standards.

⚡ Quick Decision Tree

What do you need to do?

  1. Create a NEW skill:

  2. Improve an EXISTING skill:

  3. Verify Compliance:

📚 Component Index

ComponentPurpose
CSO"SEO for LLMs". How to write descriptions that trigger.
StandardsFile naming, YAML frontmatter, directory structure.
Anti-RationalizationHow to write rules that agents won't ignore.
TestingHow to ensure your skill actually works.

🛠️ Templates

When to Use

  • Creating a NEW skill from scratch
  • Improving an EXISTING skill that agents ignore
  • Debugging why a skill isn't being triggered
  • Standardizing skills across a team

How It Works

  1. Identify goal → Use decision tree above
  2. Select template → From references/templates/
  3. Apply CSO → Optimize description for discovery
  4. Add anti-rationalization → For discipline skills
  5. Test → RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle

Quick Example

---
name: my-technique
description: Use when [specific symptom occurs].
metadata:
  category: technique
  triggers: error-text, symptom, tool-name
---

# My Technique

## When to Use
- [Symptom A]
- [Error message]

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Description summarizes workflowDescribe the capability and specific use conditions concisely
No metadata.triggersOptional host-specific metadata; include useful terms in description
Generic name ("helper")Use a descriptive lowercase hyphenated ID
Long monolithic SKILL.mdSplit into references/

See gotchas.md for more.

✅ Pre-Deploy Checklist

Before deploying any skill:

  • name field matches directory name exactly
  • SKILL.md filename is ALL CAPS
  • Description explains what the skill does and when to use it
  • Frontmatter matches the target host and repository schema
  • Total lines < 500 (use references/ for more)
  • No @ force-loading in cross-references
  • Tested with real scenarios

🔗 Related Skills

  • opencode-expert: For OpenCode environment configuration
  • If your host defines /write-skill, it may provide guided creation; that command is not bundled here

Examples

Create a Tier 1 skill:

mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-technique
touch ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-technique/SKILL.md

Create a Tier 2 skill:

mkdir -p ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/references/core
touch ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/{SKILL.md,gotchas.md}
touch ~/.config/opencode/skills/my-skill/references/core/README.md

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.