Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use lightning-factory-explainer to explain how Lightning channel factories and SuperScalar could address [onboarding or scaling goal], including architecture trade-offs and assumptions.
Required inputs
[onboarding or scaling goal]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: lightning-factory-explainerdescription: Explain Bitcoin Lightning channel factories and the SuperScalar protocol — scalable Lightning onboarding using shared UTXOs, Decker-Wattenhofer trees, timeout-signature trees, MuSig2, and Taproot. No soft fork required.risk: safesource: communitydate_added: '2026-03-03'
Use this skill when
Explaining Bitcoin Lightning channel factories and scalable onboarding
Discussing the SuperScalar protocol architecture and design
Needing guidance on Decker-Wattenhofer trees, timeout-signature trees, or MuSig2
Do not use this skill when
The task is unrelated to Bitcoin or Lightning Network scaling
You need a different blockchain or Layer 2 outside this scope
Instructions
Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
Provide actionable steps and verification.
The declared community implementation at 8144225309/SuperScalar returned HTTP 404 on 2026-10-14. Do not treat it as a verified production implementation, funded-mainnet deployment, 400-test suite or audited watchtower. The original SuperScalar proposal is a protocol source, not proof that a similarly named repository implements it correctly.
Purpose
Expert guide for understanding Bitcoin Lightning Network channel factories and the SuperScalar protocol. Covers scalable onboarding, shared UTXOs, Decker-Wattenhofer invalidation trees, timeout-signature trees, Poon-Dryja channels, MuSig2 (BIP-327), and Taproot — all without requiring any soft fork.
Key Topics
Lightning channel factories and multi-party channels
SuperScalar protocol architecture
Decker-Wattenhofer invalidation trees
Timeout-signature trees
MuSig2 key aggregation (BIP-327)
Taproot script trees
LSP (Lightning Service Provider) onboarding patterns
Explain Bitcoin Lightning channel factories and scalable onboarding.
Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Review evidence
Distinguish proposal properties from a specific implementation revision. Trace funding ownership, required signers, offline/liveness assumptions, timelock ordering, old-state invalidation, recovery artifacts, fee/bump behavior and unilateral exit under congestion. Define what N measures before stating complexity. Verify HTLC/PTLC and watchtower compatibility with actual protocol versions and test vectors; a claim of no consensus change does not establish deployability or safety. Use an isolated regtest fixture; signing, funding or broadcasting with real funds needs separate explicit authorization.