← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

docs-generator

Generate technical deliverables from completed analysis: reverse-engineering reports, penetration-test reports, CTF write-ups, and signature-analysis documentation with evidence-backed structure.

Published by sickn33 ↗sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Try your first task

A source-grounded starter task has not been verified for this skill yet.

SKILL.md

name: docs-generatordescription: "Generate technical deliverables from completed analysis: reverse-engineering reports, penetration-test reports, CTF write-ups, and signature-analysis documentation with evidence-backed structure."risk: criticalsource: "https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill"source_repo: "zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill"source_type: communitydate_added: "2026-08-25"license: "MIT"license_source: "https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/blob/main/LICENSE"

Bundled upstream support

Supporting files are included at skill-relative paths. See UPSTREAM-NOTICE.md for their pinned sources, licenses, hashes, and import changes.

Technical Documentation

When to Use

  • A finished analysis needs a structured, shareable report.
  • Standardizing write-ups across multiple cases.

安全/逆向任务文档输出

当逆向/渗透/CTF/安全分析任务完成后,本 skill 负责在用户项目目录生成正式技术文档。

触发时机

  1. 逆向任务完成,已产出核心结论(算法还原、签名破解、绕过方案等)
  2. 渗透测试完成,已发现并验证漏洞
  3. CTF 题目解出,已拿到 flag
  4. 用户明确要求"写一份报告/文档/writeup"

模板选择

任务类型使用模板
APK/二进制/so 逆向references/security-report-templates.md → 逆向工程报告
渗透测试/漏洞挖掘references/security-report-templates.md → 渗透测试报告
CTF 解题references/security-report-templates.md → CTF Writeup
JS/Web 签名逆向references/security-report-templates.md → 签名逆向报告
恶意软件 / APT / 病毒分析报告references/security-report-templates.md + references/vendor-report-rules.md
通用技术文档references/templates.md → README / API 文档

厂商报告结构(Issue #65)

安全类正式报告 MUST 读取 references/vendor-report-rules.md(只取结构,不抄厂商原文)。仅在任务证据或用户明确要求时选择厂商 flavor;普通逆向和其他任务使用 flavor = null。

Flavor / Overlay何时用主参考骨架
malware明确恶意样本、木马、白加黑、钓鱼投毒火绒式:概述→流程→样本分析→应急处置→IOC
aptAPT/战役/团伙/多阶段感染链/行业定向卡巴斯基 Securelist 式:摘要→感染链→调查叙事→Interesting findings→技术分析→检测缓解→IOC
flavor = null普通 APK/ELF/PE/Mach-O 逆向、算法/固件分析、渗透 / CTF / JS 签名原任务模板 + Base 通用元素;不套 malware/APT 专属章节
thin vuln用户明确要求漏洞/补丁/CVE 技术分析概述→影响/复现→崩溃与补丁分析→防护建议(叠加在 null 上,非第 3 默认全文 flavor)

原则:模板在精不在多 —— 仅 2 个厂商全文 flavor;vuln 仅为可选 thin overlay,不另建第三套默认全文模板。 与 §0 Evidence→Finding→Path 同时生效;冲突时 Evidence 契约优先。

输出规范

  • 输出位置:用户当前项目目录(不是 skill 包目录)
  • 文件名格式:YYYY-MM-DD_[类型]-[目标简称]-report.md
  • 如果项目有 docs/ 目录:优先放在 docs/ 下
  • 编码:UTF-8
  • 语言:跟随用户对话语言(中文对话出中文报告,英文对话出英文报告)

可用性与授权

本 skill 生成文档,不授权新的渗透测试、样本执行、外部发布或数据传输。先使用已有证据;未执行的步骤标记未执行,不为填模板而运行攻击或编造结果。ops/、tool-index、RULES、diagram-generator 和其他技能不是本包依赖;缺失时使用本包内联 E/F/P 字段和 Mermaid,说明局限。自动路由、日志回写和厂商风格不是宿主已实现的功能。报告输出使用私有批准目录,避免覆盖已有证据;公开版应脱敏并去除可执行恶意附件。

质量要求

  • 所有代码块必须可直接运行或有明确上下文
  • 不要有 placeholder/TODO
  • 关键发现必须有证据支撑
  • 复现步骤必须让第三方能独立重现
  • 敏感信息(真实 token、密码、内部 URL)用占位符替代
  • MUST 包含 Evidence → Finding → Path 链(见本包 references/security-report-templates.md §0;上游 ops 全文未随包提供)
  • MUST 读取 references/vendor-report-rules.md:选定 malware / apt 或 flavor = null(漏洞任务可叠加 thin vuln);无 flavor 时只输出原任务模板和适用的 Base 元素,不强制 IOC/ATT&CK
  • SHOULD 引用 case scope.md / timeline.md(scripts/case-init.ps1)

case-init.ps1 writes scope.md, timeline.md, workitems.md, and README.md under work/<CaseName>/. It refuses to run when that case directory already exists; choose a new -CaseName to preserve prior case data.

图表集成

生成报告时,应在适当位置调用 diagram-generator skill 生成可视化图表:

报告类型建议图表图表类型
逆向工程报告函数调用关系图、数据流图Mermaid flowchart / sequenceDiagram
渗透测试报告攻击路径图、网络拓扑图Mermaid flowchart / Graphviz
CTF Writeup解题思路流程图Mermaid flowchart
JS 签名逆向报告请求链路时序图、算法流程图Mermaid sequenceDiagram / flowchart

图表以 Mermaid 代码块形式嵌入报告 markdown 中,确保可在 GitHub/GitLab 直接渲染。


Core Principles

1. Progressive Disclosure

Reveal information in layers:

LayerContentUser Question
1One-sentence descriptionWhat is it?
2Quick start code blockHow do I use it?
3Full API referenceWhat are my options?
4Architecture deep diveHow does it work?

Warnings, breaking changes, and prerequisites go at the TOP.

2. Task-Oriented Writing

<!-- Bad: Feature-oriented -->
## AuthService Class
The AuthService class provides authentication methods...

<!-- Good: Task-oriented -->
## Authenticating Users
To authenticate a user, call login() with credentials:

3. Show, Don't Tell

Every concept needs a concrete example.

Formatting Standards

  • Sentence case headings: "Getting started" not "Getting Started"
  • Max 3 heading levels: Deeper means split the doc
  • Always specify language in code blocks
  • Relative paths for internal links
  • Tables for structured data with 3+ attributes

Quality Checklist

  • Code examples have verified context; clearly distinguish actually tested from illustrative/not run
  • No placeholder text or TODOs
  • Matches actual code behavior
  • Scannable without reading everything
  • Reader knows what to do next

Anti-Patterns

ProblemFix
Wall of textBreak up with headings, bullets, code, tables
Buried critical infoWarnings/breaking changes at TOP
Missing error docsAlways document what can go wrong

Templates

For README, API endpoint, and file organization templates, see references/templates.md.

Related Skills

  • Skill(ce:writer) - Writing style, tone, and voice (load The Engineer persona)
  • Skill(ce:visualizing-with-mermaid) - Architecture and flow diagrams

按需自举(On-Demand Bootstrap)

本 skill 不依赖外部工具,纯文本生成。无需 bootstrap。

如果需要渲染图表嵌入报告,会调用 diagram-generator/ skill。


路由上下文

上游入口: 所有安全/逆向 skill 在任务完成后自动调用本 skill 触发方式:

  • 自动:任务完成后作为行为链第 9 步执行
  • 手动:用户说"写报告"、"出文档"、"writeup"

同级关联模块:

  • apk-reverse/ — APK 逆向完成后生成逆向报告
  • ida-reverse/ — 二进制分析完成后生成逆向报告
  • radare2/ — CLI 分析完成后生成逆向报告
  • js-reverse/ — JS 签名逆向完成后生成签名报告
  • reverse-engineering/ — 通用逆向完成后生成逆向报告
  • field-journal/ — 报告内容同时作为进化日志的数据来源

安全报告模板: references/security-report-templates.md 厂商报告规则: references/vendor-report-rules.md(flavor: malware | apt | null;optional overlay: vuln) 通用文档模板: references/templates.md

任务完成自检(声称完成前 MUST 通过)

  • 已说明实际执行、未执行和不适用步骤,未为补全模板而越权执行?
  • 工具/依赖是否确实可用,缺失项是否如实标注?
  • 我是否产出了可复现证据(命令/脚本/截图/报告)?
  • 报告是否含 Evidence / Finding / Path(ops 契约)?
  • 是否只按用户授权和当前项目要求保存报告/清单?

Limitations

  • Report quality is bounded by the evidence captured during analysis.
  • Templates assume technical audiences; executive summaries need tailoring.

Adapted from zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill (MIT).