← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

api-integration

Designs event-driven architectures, webhook systems, API chaining flows, ETL pipelines, and integration patterns between services.

Published by sickn33 ↗sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Try your first task

Design one event integration

Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.

Use api-integration to design [source service] to [destination service] integration for [one event workflow] within [existing stack]. Return versioned event schemas, correlation IDs, state-change idempotency, independent failure handling, bounded jittered backoff, dead-letter/manual replay paths, and compensation boundaries. For webhooks, document provider-specific signature validation, bounded input, timestamps/replay protection, and an authorized test-endpoint plan. Identify required dependencies, credentials, and current protocol assumptions; distinguish design from checks actually performed. Do not transmit events, make payments, change accounts, or deploy from this design task.

Required inputs

  • [source service]
  • [destination service]
  • [one event workflow]
  • [existing stack]

User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗

SKILL.md

name: api-integrationdescription: Designs event-driven architectures, webhook systems, API chaining flows, ETL pipelines, and integration patterns between services.license: MITmetadata:   aas-risk: none  aas-source: https://github.com/LambdaTest/agent-skills/tree/main/api-skill/api-integration-helper  aas-source-repo: LambdaTest/agent-skills  aas-source-type: community  aas-date-added: '2026-07-01'  aas-license-source: https://github.com/LambdaTest/agent-skills/blob/main/LICENSE

API Integration Skill

When to Use

Use this skill when you need designs event-driven architectures, webhook systems, API chaining flows, ETL pipelines, and integration patterns between services. Use whenever the user asks about webhooks, event streaming, API composition, connecting two or more APIs, building pipelines, Pub/Sub, Kafka topics, ETL...

Design integration patterns, webhook flows, event pipelines, and API composition strategies.


Webhook Design

Outbound Webhook Endpoint (from your system to 3rd party)

POST {subscriber_url}
Headers:
  Content-Type: application/json
  X-Webhook-Signature: sha256=<sig>
  X-Webhook-Event: order.created
  X-Webhook-Delivery: <uuid>
  X-Webhook-Timestamp: <unix-epoch>

Payload envelope

{
  "event": "order.created",
  "delivery_id": "uuid",
  "created_at": "ISO8601",
  "data": { ... }
}

Signature verification (receiver side):

import hmac, hashlib
expected = hmac.new(secret.encode(), payload_bytes, hashlib.sha256).hexdigest()
# webhook-signature-example: do not use assert for an authorization boundary
if not hmac.compare_digest(f"sha256={expected}", request.headers.get("X-Webhook-Signature", "")):
    raise ValueError("Invalid webhook signature")

Inbound Webhook Registration API

POST   /api/v1/webhooks           — register subscriber URL + events
GET    /api/v1/webhooks           — list subscriptions
DELETE /api/v1/webhooks/{id}      — unsubscribe
POST   /api/v1/webhooks/{id}/test — fire test event
GET    /api/v1/webhooks/{id}/deliveries — delivery history + status

API Chaining / Composition Pattern

Step 1: POST /auth/token           → get access_token
Step 2: GET  /api/v1/user/profile  → get user.id (use token from step 1)
Step 3: POST /api/v1/orders        → create order (use user.id from step 2)
Step 4: POST /api/v1/payments      → charge (use order.id from step 3)

Always: handle failures at each step independently, use idempotency keys, implement retry with exponential backoff.


Event-Driven Architecture

Event Schema (CloudEvents spec)

{
  "specversion": "1.0",
  "type": "com.example.order.created",
  "source": "/orders-service",
  "id": "uuid",
  "time": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
  "datacontenttype": "application/json",
  "data": { "order_id": "...", "amount": 99.99 }
}

Topics / Queues design

TopicProducersConsumersRetention
orders.createdorders-svcpayments-svc, email-svc7 days
payments.completedpayments-svcorders-svc, ledger-svc30 days
users.deletedusers-svcall services90 days

Saga Pattern (Distributed Transaction)

Choreography saga for order checkout:
1. orders-svc emits order.created
2. inventory-svc reserves stock → emits inventory.reserved
3. payments-svc charges card → emits payment.completed
4. orders-svc emits order.confirmed

On failure at step 3:
← payments-svc emits payment.failed
← inventory-svc releases stock (compensating transaction)
← orders-svc emits order.cancelled

Outbox Pattern (reliable event publishing)

-- Transactional outbox table
CREATE TABLE outbox_events (
  id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
  aggregate_type VARCHAR,
  aggregate_id UUID,
  event_type VARCHAR,
  payload JSONB,
  created_at TIMESTAMP,
  published_at TIMESTAMP NULL
);
-- Write to DB + outbox in same transaction
-- Separate publisher polls outbox and sends to message broker

Integration Checklist

  • Idempotency keys on all state-changing calls
  • Retry with exponential backoff (base 1s, max 60s, jitter)
  • Circuit breaker (open after 5 failures in 10s)
  • Dead-letter queue for unprocessable events
  • Webhook delivery logging + manual replay endpoint
  • Schema versioning on all events
  • Correlation IDs on all inter-service calls

Handoff

Report the event schemas, delivery/retry policy, idempotency and compensation boundaries, and the checks actually performed. Signature verification also needs the provider's current protocol, bounded input, timestamp/replay protection and an authorized test endpoint. A design is not evidence that an integration or payment ran.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
  • Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
  • Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.