acceptance-orchestrator

name: acceptance-orchestratordescription: Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.risk: criticalsource: communitydate_added: "2026-03-12"

Acceptance Orchestrator

Overview

Orchestrate coding work as a state machine that ends only when acceptance criteria are verified with evidence or the task is explicitly escalated.

Core rule: do not optimize for "code changed"; optimize for "DoD proven".

When to Use

• The task already has an issue or clear acceptance criteria and should run end-to-end with minimal human re-intervention.
• You need structured handoff across implementation, review, deployment, and final verification.
• You want explicit stop conditions and escalation instead of silent partial completion.

Required Sub-Skills

• create-issue-gate
• closed-loop-delivery
• verification-before-completion

Deployment and PR monitoring are project-specific capabilities, not bundled sub-skills. Use the repository's actual deployment and review procedures; the legacy names deploy-dev, pr-watch, pr-review-autopilot, and git-ship are not available in AAS.

Inputs

Require these inputs:

• issue id or issue body
• issue status
• acceptance criteria (DoD)
• target environment (dev default)

Fixed defaults:

• max iteration rounds = 2
• PR review polling = 3m -> 6m -> 10m

State Machine

• intake
• issue-gated
• executing
• review-loop
• deploy-verify
• accepted
• escalated

Workflow

1. Intake

   • Read issue and extract task goal + DoD.

2. Issue gate

   • Use create-issue-gate logic.
   • If issue is not ready or execution gate is not allowed, stop immediately.
   • Do not implement anything while issue remains draft.

3. Execute

   • Hand off to closed-loop-delivery for implementation and local verification.

4. Review loop

   • If PR feedback is relevant, batch polling windows as:
     • wait 3m
     • then 6m
     • then 10m
   • After the 10m round, stop waiting and process all visible comments together.

5. Deploy and runtime verification

   • If DoD depends on runtime behavior, verify the explicitly authorized environment.
   • A dev label does not grant deployment permission; inspect effects and use the project's deployment gate before changing any shared environment.
   • Verify with real logs/API/Lambda behavior, not assumptions.

6. Completion gate

   • Before any claim of completion, require verification-before-completion.
   • No success claim without fresh evidence.

Stop Conditions

Move to accepted only when every acceptance criterion has matching evidence.

Move to escalated when any of these happen:

• DoD still fails after 2 full rounds
• missing secrets/permissions/external dependency blocks progress
• task needs production action or destructive operation approval
• review instructions conflict and cannot both be satisfied

Human Gates

Always stop for human confirmation on:

• prod/stage deploys beyond agreed scope
• destructive git/data operations
• billing or security posture changes
• missing user-provided acceptance criteria

Output Contract

When reporting status, always include:

• Status: intake / executing / accepted / escalated
• Acceptance Criteria: pass/fail checklist
• Evidence: commands, logs, API results, or runtime proof
• Open Risks: anything still uncertain
• Need Human Input: smallest next decision, if blocked

Do not report "done" unless status is accepted.

Example

User request:

Take this issue and its acceptance criteria through implementation, validation, review, and a final evidence-backed verdict.

Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.