pedagogy-review

name: pedagogy-reviewdescription: Holistic pedagogical review of a lecture deck (`.qmd` or `.tex`). Checks narrative arc, prerequisite assumptions, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck-level pacing. Use when user says "pedagogy review", "does this teach well?", "is the flow right?", "will students follow?", "review the narrative", or before teaching a deck for the first time. Read-only; produces a report.

pedagogy-review

This skill's instructions live in .claude/skills/pedagogy-review/SKILL.md. Read that file now and follow it, with the files it points to. Read AGENTS.md first if you have not already.

It was written for Claude Code. Running it from Codex, Antigravity or another agent:

• Arguments. Where it says $ARGUMENTS, use what the user asked for.
• Claude Code agents. Where a step hands work to an agent in .claude/agents/ (through the Agent or Task tool), do that step where it appears in the procedure: never later, and never skip it. A step that gates what follows still gates it (/commit runs its verifier before it commits). Read the agent's file for what the step checks.
• Fresh context. If the step needs a context that has not seen your work, for example a claim verifier that must never see the draft, run it in a separate session or worker that has not seen the draft, if your tool can start one, and give it only what the step says to pass. If it cannot, do the step yourself, mark every result it produced not independently verified, and tell the user to repeat that check in Claude Code (/verify-claims for citations) before relying on it.
• Claude Code settings. allowed-tools, model, effort, argument-hint and disable-model-invocation in the source's frontmatter configure Claude Code. Ignore them.
• Guards. Claude Code's guard hooks do not run for you. Follow the rules in AGENTS.md yourself; the git pre-commit gate and CI still apply to your commits.