← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

rig-bundles-and-shareable-artifacts

Use when authoring or installing a rig bundle (packaged, shareable artifact that instantiates an opinionated OpenRig topology + workflow), reasoning about the bundle vs extension boundary, or auditing a bundle for portability. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent bundles from working anywhere but the operator's machine, and the inspect-before-install discipline.

Published by mvschwarz ↗mvschwarz/openrig

Try your first task

A source-grounded starter task has not been verified for this skill yet.

SKILL.md

name: rig-bundles-and-shareable-artifactsdescription: Use when authoring or installing a rig bundle (packaged, shareable artifact that instantiates an opinionated OpenRig topology + workflow), reasoning about the bundle vs extension boundary, or auditing a bundle for portability. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent bundles from working anywhere but the operator's machine, and the inspect-before-install discipline.metadata:   cli_surfaces_referenced:     - bundle create    - bundle inspect    - bundle install  openrig:     stage: factory-approved    sibling_skills:       - rig-lifecycle      - topology-mutation-and-seat-management      - seat-scaling-and-specialization      - cross-host-rig-commands      - sidecar-operator      - specification-system      - extension-and-user-workspace

Rig Bundles and Shareable Artifacts

A rig bundle is a packaged, shareable artifact that can instantiate an opinionated OpenRig topology and workflow. It may include:

  • rig specs
  • agent specs
  • workflow specs
  • startup files
  • skills or skill references
  • operating-mode declarations
  • proof expectations
  • supporting fragments

Shareable artifact is broader than bundle: specs, bundles, skills, workflows, and extensions can all be shared. A bundle is the packaged form for "load this topology and way of working."

Use this when

  • Authoring a bundle from a proven lab pattern
  • Installing a bundle (rig bundle install <path>)
  • Inspecting a bundle before install (rig bundle inspect <path>)
  • Reasoning about bundle vs extension boundary (bundle declares topology + workflow; extension adds behavior)
  • Auditing a bundle for portability — does it work on a clean OpenRig environment, or only the author's machine?

Don't use this when

  • The work is a one-off topology you won't reuse. Specs alone are sufficient.
  • The intent is to add runtime behavior (commands, views, dashboards). Use extension-and-user-workspace, not bundles.
  • You want to ship a workflow as a daemon feature. Bundle is the path before daemon promotion.

The bundle vs extension boundary (load-bearing)

ConceptDeclaresExample
BundleRig shape + workflow ("load this topology and way of working")A Velocity Team bundle
ExtensionBehavior added to user workspace/runtimeA custom command, view, or dashboard

Don't confuse them. A bundle is opinionated content; an extension is added behavior. Both can be shareable artifacts, but they're structurally distinct.

Failure modes (4)

  1. A bundle works only on the operator's machine because paths, providers, or credentials are implicit. Bundles must be self-describing for a clean OpenRig environment.
  2. A bundle includes too much local state and becomes a backup archive instead of a reusable artifact. Bundle is the intended shape, not the current state of one specific install.
  3. A bundle declares topology but omits proof expectations or workflow mode. Topology alone doesn't tell users what "working as advertised" means.
  4. Users cannot inspect what a bundle will create before installing it. rig bundle inspect must show what will be created without side effects.

From an exported team to a submission

rig export <rig> -o <folder>/rig.yaml writes the spec, not a README, so an exported team has none of its own. Before you bundle or submit it, add a README.md to the folder, declare it in rig.yaml as docs: [{ path: README.md }], and run rig bundle check <folder> until it reports no findings. The openrig.dev/rigs registry check runs the same check on the folder at the submitted ref, and any finding fails it. The full walk-through is the publishing guide, publishing-a-rig-bundle.md in $OPENRIG_HOME/reference/.

Proof standard

Proof should:

  1. Install the bundle into a clean OpenRig environment
  2. Instantiate it
  3. Verify the expected seats and workflow mode
  4. Run a small smoke proof that the topology behaves as advertised

Bundle path → product

Bundles are how proven lab patterns become reusable product experiences:

local dogfood pattern
  → bundle (with manifest, parameterization, proof expectations)
  → installed by another user on clean OpenRig
  → opinionated workflow shipped without becoming a daemon feature
  → if dependable, graduate parts into core daemon

This is also how OpenRig can ship opinionated workflows without making every workflow a daemon feature.

See also

  • extension-and-user-workspace skill — sibling primitive for user-owned behavior added to runtime; bundle vs extension boundary
  • specification-system skill — rig specs / agent specs / workflow specs that bundles package
  • agent-starters skill — bundles can include or reference Agent Starters
  • openrig-user skill — rig bundle create / inspect / install CLI surface