Skills / mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills / hunting-for-spearphishing-indicators Try your first task hunting-for-spearphishing-indicators
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use hunting-for-spearphishing-indicators to hunt authorized [email, endpoint, and network data sources] for spearphishing activity within [time range and investigation scope] , correlate relevant findings across the available telemetry, and deliver a prioritized hunt report with evidence, confidence, risk, and recommended response actions. Required inputs User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
name: hunting-for-spearphishing-indicators description: Hunt for spearphishing campaign indicators across email logs, endpoint telemetry, and network data to detect targeted email attacks. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: threat-hunting tags: - threat-hunting - mitre-attack - spearphishing - initial-access - email-security - t1566 - proactive-detection version: '1.0' author: mahipal license: Apache-2.0 d3fend_techniques: - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Application Protocol Command Analysis - Identifier Analysis - Content Format Conversion - Message Analysis nist_csf: - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - DE.AE-07 - ID.RA-05 mitre_attack: - T1046 - T1057 - T1082 - T1083 - T1566 mitre_f3: version: '1.1' tactics: - reconnaissance - initial-access - resource-development techniques: - id: T1660 name: Phishing tactic: initial-access source: attack - id: T1598 name: Phishing for Information tactic: reconnaissance source: attack - id: T1593 name: Search Open Websites/Domains tactic: reconnaissance source: attack - id: F1031 name: Impersonate Account Holder tactic: initial-access source: f3 - id: F1020.002 name: 'Create Fake Materials: Fake Website' tactic: resource-development source: f3 Hunting For Spearphishing Indicators
When to Use
When proactively hunting for indicators of hunting for spearphishing indicators in the environment
After threat intelligence indicates active campaigns using these techniques
During incident response to scope compromise related to these techniques
When EDR or SIEM alerts trigger on related indicators
During periodic security assessments and purple team exercises
Prerequisites
EDR platform with process and network telemetry (CrowdStrike, MDE, SentinelOne)
SIEM with relevant log data ingested (Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel)
Sysmon deployed with comprehensive configuration
Windows Security Event Log forwarding enabled
Threat intelligence feeds for IOC correlation
Workflow
Formulate Hypothesis : Define a testable hypothesis based on threat intelligence or ATT&CK gap analysis.
Identify Data Sources : Determine which logs and telemetry are needed to validate or refute the hypothesis.
Execute Queries : Run detection queries against SIEM and EDR platforms to collect relevant events.
Analyze Results : Examine query results for anomalies, correlating across multiple data sources.
Validate Findings : Distinguish true positives from false positives through contextual analysis.
Correlate Activity : Link findings to broader attack chains and threat actor TTPs.
Document and Report : Record findings, update detection rules, and recommend response actions.
Key Concepts
Tools & Systems
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1 : Macro-enabled Excel executing PowerShell downloader
Scenario 2 : HTML smuggling delivering ISO with LNK payload
Scenario 3 : Credential harvesting link as SharePoint notification
Scenario 4 : QR code phishing in PDF attachment
Output Format
Hunt ID: TH-HUNTIN-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Technique: T1566.001
Host: [Hostname]
User: [Account context]
Evidence: [Log entries, process trees, network data]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
Recommended Action: [Containment, investigation, monitoring]