Prepare a journalist to interview a source or subject — including hostile or accountability interviews. Use when a reporter needs to prep an interview with a source, plan questions for a subject, handle an on-the-record accountability interview, or get a reluctant person to talk. Produces a question plan sequenced from rapport to the hard asks, ground-rules handling (on/off record, attribution), techniques for evasive or hostile subjects, and a capture plan. Distinct from expert-interview-prep (learning from an expert).
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use source-interview-prep to prepare an on-the-record interview with [subject] for [story], including agreed ground rules, sequenced questions, an evasive-response plan, and a recording-consent note.
Required inputs
[subject]
[story]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: source-interview-prepdescription: "Prepare a journalist to interview a source or subject — including hostile or accountability interviews. Use when a reporter needs to prep an interview with a source, plan questions for a subject, handle an on-the-record accountability interview, or get a reluctant person to talk. Produces a question plan sequenced from rapport to the hard asks, ground-rules handling (on/off record, attribution), techniques for evasive or hostile subjects, and a capture plan. Distinct from expert-interview-prep (learning from an expert)."
Source Interview Prep Skill
A journalistic interview isn't a friendly chat or a research call — it's an on-the-record exchange where the subject may have every reason not to answer straight. This skill preps the interview to get truthful, usable, attributable answers: rapport first, the hard questions sequenced so they don't end the conversation early, and a plan for the dodge.
Working from a brief
Given the subject and the story, write the full prep — infer where the subject is cooperative vs. defensive and sequence accordingly. Always handle ground rules explicitly; never counsel deception or entrapment.
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not provided, else infer and label):
Who you're interviewing and their relationship to the story (witness, expert, accountable party, whistleblower)
What you need — the facts, quotes, or confirmation this interview must produce
The dynamic — cooperative, reluctant, or adversarial; on/off record expectations
Output Format
Ground rules (settle first)
On-the-record vs. background vs. off-the-record vs. not-for-attribution — define them, agree them up front, and note how you'll handle mid-interview attempts to go off-record.
Question plan (sequenced)
Open / rapport — easy, establishing questions.
Build the record — the factual, chronological questions.
The core asks — the questions the story needs, specific and answerable.
The hard questions — accountability/contradiction questions, placed after you have the record (so they can't just walk).
Close — "what did I not ask?" and "who else should I talk to?"
Handling the dodge
Techniques for the evasive or hostile subject: the follow-up that closes the gap, repeating the unanswered question, using documents/quotes to press, silence, and staying neutral rather than arguing.
Capture plan
Recording (and consent/legal note — recording-consent laws vary by jurisdiction), notes, and how you'll verify quotes.
Quality Checks
Ground rules (on/off record, attribution) are defined and agreed before the hard part
Questions are sequenced rapport → record → core → hard, not front-loaded with accusations
The core asks are specific and answerable, tied to what the story needs
There's a concrete plan for evasive/hostile responses
Capture includes a recording-consent/legal note (laws vary by jurisdiction)
No advice to deceive, entrap, or misrepresent who you are
Anti-Patterns
Leading with the accusatory question (the subject shuts down or leaves)
Never settling on/off-record, then fighting about it later
Vague questions that invite a non-answer
Arguing with or editorializing at the subject instead of pressing on facts
No plan for the dodge — accepting the first evasion
Recording without regard for consent law
Example Trigger Phrases
"Plan questions for a subject."
"Handle an on-the-record accountability interview."