Give someone difficult feedback — a report, a peer, a friend — so it actually lands and helps, without crushing them or dodging the point. Use when asked how do I give hard feedback, tell someone something difficult, address a problem with someone, or have a tough conversation about their [work/behavior]. Produces a read on what you actually need to say (the specific behavior and its impact, not a vague vibe), a structure that's direct and kind at once, the exact opening and words, how to invite their side and land on a path forward, and the traps (sandwiching it away, going vague, making it a
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use give-hard-feedback-kindly to draft direct, constructive feedback about [specific behavior and impact], tailored to the relationship and including an opening, invitation for their perspective, and a concrete path forward.
Required inputs
[specific behavior and impact]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: give-hard-feedback-kindlydescription: "Give someone difficult feedback — a report, a peer, a friend — so it actually lands and helps, without crushing them or dodging the point. Use when asked how do I give hard feedback, tell someone something difficult, address a problem with someone, or have a tough conversation about their [work/behavior]. Produces a read on what you actually need to say (the specific behavior and its impact, not a vague vibe), a structure that's direct and kind at once, the exact opening and words, how to invite their side and land on a path forward, and the traps (sandwiching it away, going vague, making it about character)."
Give Hard Feedback Kindly
Most people botch hard feedback two ways: they soften it until the point disappears (kind but useless), or they deliver it bluntly and defensively (clear but wounding). The skill is doing both at once — direct and caring. This helps you pin down the specific thing to say, structure it so it lands and helps, and handle their reaction — so the person leaves clear on what to change and still intact.
What This Skill Produces
The actual message — the specific behavior and its concrete impact (not a vague "you need to improve" or a mood)
A direct-and-kind structure — care for the person + clarity on the problem, without the compliment-sandwich that buries it
The opening and words — how to start (signal it's constructive, get to the point) and the specific phrasing
Space for their side — how to invite their perspective genuinely, not as a formality
A path forward — what good looks like and the concrete next step, so it's help, not just criticism
The traps — sandwiching the point into oblivion, going vague to avoid discomfort, and attacking character instead of behavior
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
The issue — the specific behavior/problem (push for specifics if it's vague)
The impact — what it's actually affecting (why it matters)
The relationship — report, peer, boss, friend, family (changes tone and standing)
History — first time raising it, or a pattern
Your goal — change the behavior while keeping the relationship
Framework: Direct And Kind, About Behavior
Get specific. Vague feedback ("be more professional") can't be acted on and feels like an attack — pin the exact behavior and its concrete impact.
Care and be clear at once. Genuine care for the person and directness about the problem — not one softened by the other. Skip the compliment sandwich that hides the message.
Open honestly, get to the point. Signal it's meant constructively, then say the thing — burying the lede prolongs the discomfort and confuses them.
Attack the behavior, not the character. "When X happened, the impact was Y" lands; "you're careless/lazy" wounds and triggers defense.
Invite their side. Ask genuinely for their perspective — you may be missing context, and it makes it a conversation, not a verdict.
Land on a path forward. End with what good looks like and a concrete next step — feedback without a path is just criticism.
Output Format
Hard feedback: [the issue] · to [person] · [relationship]
What to actually say: [the specific behavior + its concrete impact].
Open with: [signal constructive intent + get to the point].
The message (direct + kind):
[Behavior + impact, plainly and caringly — no sandwich, no character attack].
Invite their side: "[genuine ask for their perspective]".
Path forward: [what good looks like + the concrete next step].
Avoid: compliment-sandwiching it away · vagueness · making it about who they are.
Quality Checks
The feedback is specific (behavior + impact), not vague
It's direct and kind at once, without a burying sandwich
Opens honestly and gets to the point
Targets behavior, not character
Genuinely invites the person's perspective
Ends with a concrete path forward
Anti-Patterns
The compliment sandwich that hides the message.
Vagueness to avoid discomfort ("just do better").
Character attacks ("you're lazy") instead of behavior.
No path forward — criticism with no next step.
Not inviting their side — a verdict, not a conversation.
Example Trigger Phrases
"I need to give a team member hard feedback about missed deadlines."
"How do I tell a friend something difficult without hurting them?"
"Help me address a problem with a coworker's behavior."
"I have to have a tough conversation about someone's work. What do I say?"
"How do I give critical feedback that actually lands?"