Run a tabletop drill of a voice-clone or deepfake fraud attempt — the 'CEO needs this wire today' call — against your actual approval process, before a real attacker does, then debrief the tells and fix the process gap. Use when someone asks to train the team on deepfake fraud, test wire-transfer controls, run a social-engineering tabletop, or 'could we get CEO-frauded?'. Produces a drill scenario pack, a facilitator script, a tells checklist, and the process fixes the drill exposed. Defensive training only.
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use deepfake-drill to design an announced tabletop drill for [payment/change approval process] and [participants], producing a facilitator script, tells checklist, and owner-and-date remediation plan without cloning or impersonation techniques.
Required inputs
[payment/change approval process]
[participants]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: deepfake-drilldescription: "Run a tabletop drill of a voice-clone or deepfake fraud attempt — the 'CEO needs this wire today' call — against your actual approval process, before a real attacker does, then debrief the tells and fix the process gap. Use when someone asks to train the team on deepfake fraud, test wire-transfer controls, run a social-engineering tabletop, or 'could we get CEO-frauded?'. Produces a drill scenario pack, a facilitator script, a tells checklist, and the process fixes the drill exposed. Defensive training only."
Deepfake Drill Skill
The finance teams that lose seven figures to a cloned voice all describe the
same call afterwards: it sounded exactly like him, he knew the deal names, he
was stressed, it was 4:55pm on a Friday. Voice cloning needs seconds of audio
now; the defense isn't detecting the fake — assume you can't — it's a process
that holds even when the voice is perfect. This skill drills that process as a
tabletop exercise: realistic pressure, your actual approval chain, and a
debrief that fixes the gap the drill finds. It trains defenders; it does not
help attackers — no cloning instructions, no evasion tips, ever.
What This Skill Produces
A drill scenario pack tailored to your org: the pretext, the pressure
timeline, the escalating asks — written for a facilitator to read aloud,
not for realism tooling
A facilitator script with decision points, expected-control checkpoints,
and legitimate-looking curveballs ("the CFO is genuinely on a plane")
A tells checklist the team keeps afterwards: process tells (urgency +
secrecy + channel-switch + authority), not audio tells
A gap report template: which control held, which was bypassed and how,
the fix, the re-drill date
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
The process being drilled: who can request payments/changes, who approves,
above what thresholds, through which channels
The realistic attacker's knowledge: what's public about your execs, deals,
vendors (assume LinkedIn + your press page)
Who's being drilled and whether it's announced or unannounced (recommend
announced-window: "a drill will happen this month" — trains without the
trust damage of full ambush)
Any real near-misses to build from
Process
Design the scenario around YOUR weakest legitimate path. The drill
pretexts that work are the ones your process half-allows: the acquisition
that's "still confidential", the vendor bank-detail change, the exec
travelling. Pick one, build the pretext from information a real attacker
could gather publicly.
Script the pressure, not the technology. The facilitator plays the
caller using the three levers every real case uses — urgency (deadline in
minutes), secrecy (tell no one, deal sensitivity), authority (the voice/name
at the top) — plus the channel-switch ("can't do email, I'm boarding").
The script says what the caller says; it never explains how to clone a
voice, and redirect any such request.
Let the process fail safely. Facilitator notes for each decision point:
what the control should catch, what to say if the participant bypasses it,
when to escalate the pressure once. No individual shaming — the drill
grades the process, and the debrief says so out loud.
Debrief on tells and controls. The checklist that stays: any payment or
detail-change request combining urgency + secrecy + channel-switch gets
out-of-band verification on a known number, no exceptions for rank — the
callback rule is the whole defense. Score which controls held.
Fix and re-drill. Every gap gets an owner, a fix, and a date; the
re-drill uses a different pretext. Recommend an annual cadence and folding
the callback rule into onboarding.
Output Format
## Drill scenario: [pretext name]
[Setup, what the attacker plausibly knows, the ask sequence, timing]
## Facilitator script
[Read-aloud beats · decision points with expected control · escalation and
curveball notes · hard stop conditions]
## The tells checklist (keep this)
[Process tells + the callback rule, one page]
## Gap report
| Control | Held / bypassed | How | Fix | Owner | Re-drill date |
## Aftercare
[The no-blame debrief framing + the announcement for the wider team]
Quality Checks
The scenario is built from the org's own process and public information —
generic scripts don't find real gaps
Zero content that teaches attack technique: no cloning tools, methods, or
detection-evasion — pressure is scripted as dialogue only
The debrief framing is process-blame, not person-blame, explicitly
The callback rule appears verbatim in the tells checklist with the
"no exceptions for rank" clause
Every gap in the report has an owner and a re-drill date
Anti-Patterns
Do not produce actual cloned audio, cloning instructions, or tool
recommendations for impersonation — decline that direction plainly, even
"for realism"; the drill works as read-aloud tabletop
Do not run fully unannounced ambush drills on individuals — announced
windows train; ambushes traumatize and get the program cancelled
Do not let the drill conclude "train people to hear fakes" — the
defense is the callback rule, because the fakes are already good enough
Do not skip finance-adjacent paths: payroll detail changes and vendor
bank updates are the same attack in cheaper clothes
Related
[[scam-message-decoder]] for the text/email versions; [[oncall-runbook]]
patterns for the verification procedure; [[incident-postmortem]] if drilling
because a real attempt already happened.
Example Trigger Phrases
"Train the team on deepfake fraud."
"Test wire-transfer controls."
"Run a social-engineering tabletop."
"Could we get CEO-frauded?"
deepfake-drill by mohitagw15856 · The Skill Leaderboard