creator-deal-decoder

name: creator-deal-decoderdescription: "Decode a brand deal or UGC contract before signing — usage rights, exclusivity windows, whitelisting, payment terms, and kill clauses ranked 🔴🟡🟢 by what they can cost a creator, plus the counter-ask email. Use when a creator says 'is this brand deal fair', 'what does perpetual usage mean', 'they sent me a contract', or 'should I sign this collab agreement'. Produces a clause-by-clause decode, a money-math check on the rate, and a ready-to-send negotiation email. Not legal advice."

Creator Deal Decoder Skill

Creators sign their first brand contracts at nineteen, alone, excited, and against a legal team. The expensive clauses are never the ones about the deliverable — they're the quiet ones: perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free usage (your face in their ads forever), category exclusivity (no other skincare deals for 12 months, priced at one video), whitelisting (they run ads from YOUR account), and payment net-60 with a revisions clause that makes it net-forever. This skill decodes the document the way [[lease-decoder]] decodes a lease: plain language, severity-ranked, money math shown — and ends with the counter-ask email, because the first contract is a first offer.

What This Skill Produces

• A clause-by-clause decode in plain language, ranked 🔴 (can cost real money or your channel) / 🟡 (negotiate) / 🟢 (standard)
• The money math: what the rate implies per deliverable including the exclusivity and usage you're actually selling — the rate is never just for the video
• A counter-ask email, polite and specific, with the 2–3 changes that matter most and fallback positions
• A walk-away line: the clause combination that makes this deal worse than no deal

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not already provided):

• The contract text (paste it; decode only what's actually there)
• The creator's side: platform(s), audience size, typical rates if known, how much they want/need this deal
• The deliverables as they understand them, and the offered fee
• Any other income this could block (existing or hoped-for deals in the category)

Framework: the six places creator money hides

Decode every clause, but hunt these specifically:

1. Usage & licensing — how long, where, and how they can use the content (and the creator's face/name). Organic social for 90 days is normal; perpetual, all-media, royalty-free is them buying an ad campaign for the price of a post. Paid usage beyond the original post is a separate, priced thing.
2. Exclusivity — category, scope, duration. Price it: months of blocked category deals × typical deal value = the real cost. A $2k deal with 12-month skincare exclusivity can be a $10k gift to the brand.
3. Whitelisting / spark ads — ads run from the creator's own handle, spending the creator's audience trust. Separately priced, time-boxed, with spend caps, or struck.
4. Approvals & revisions — unlimited revisions is unlimited unpaid work; cap the rounds. "Brand may reject at sole discretion" plus payment-on- approval is a kill clause wearing a process costume.
5. Payment terms — net-30 max for small creators, late fees named, deposit for first-time partners, and payment tied to delivery, not to brand approval or performance.
6. Morality/termination clauses — one-sided termination, clawbacks on posted content, vague "brings brand into disrepute" standards; flag the asymmetries (can the creator terminate too?).

Output Format

## The deal in one line
[What they're actually buying for what price]

## Clause decode
| Clause (quoted) | Plain English | 🔴🟡🟢 | Why it matters here |

## The money math
[Fee vs what's being sold: deliverables + usage + exclusivity, priced out]

## The counter-ask email (ready to send)
[Warm open · the 2-3 asks with specific replacement language · fallbacks]

## Walk-away line
[The combination that makes this worse than no deal]

⚠ This is a decode, not legal advice — for deals with real money or long
exclusivity, a contract lawyer's hour is cheap insurance.

Quality Checks

• Every 🔴 quotes the actual clause text — no flags without receipts
• Exclusivity and usage are priced, not just flagged — the money math is what turns "hm" into a counter-ask
• The counter-email asks for at most three changes, with replacement wording the brand can literally accept
• Standard-and-fine clauses are marked 🟢 — a decode that flags everything teaches nothing
• The not-legal-advice line is present and the lawyer threshold is concrete (real money, long exclusivity, IP transfer)

Anti-Patterns

• Do not decode clauses that aren't in the pasted text — "usually these contracts also…" is labelled as a general note, never as this contract
• Do not advise signing or refusing outright — decode, price, counter; the creator decides
• Do not write the counter-email combative — brands walk from hostile counters and accept specific ones
• Do not let excitement discount the math; "great exposure" appears in the money math at its actual price: $0 unless evidenced

Related

[[first-client-contract]] for freelance service contracts; [[influencer-brief]] is the brand's side of this table; [[late-invoice-escalation]] when net-30 becomes net-never.

Example Trigger Phrases

• "Is this brand deal fair?"
• "What does perpetual usage mean?"
• "Should I sign this collab agreement?"