Prepare and rehearse a coming-out conversation, tuned to the specific person and the real risk — what to say, how to open, how to handle the likely reactions, and a safety-first plan if it could go badly. Use when someone says 'I want to come out to my parents/boss/friend', 'help me tell them I'm [gay/trans/bi/etc.]', 'rehearse this conversation with me', or is planning any identity disclosure. Produces an opener, a rehearsal against realistic reactions, and a safety plan. Safety and the user's autonomy come first — it never pushes anyone to come out.
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use coming-out-rehearsal to prepare a safety-first, person-specific opener, realistic rehearsal, and after-plan for telling [person and likely reaction] about [disclosure and goal], considering [dependency or safety risks]; make clear that waiting or not disclosing is valid.
Required inputs
[person and likely reaction]
[disclosure and goal]
[dependency or safety risks]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: coming-out-rehearsaldescription: "Prepare and rehearse a coming-out conversation, tuned to the specific person and the real risk — what to say, how to open, how to handle the likely reactions, and a safety-first plan if it could go badly. Use when someone says 'I want to come out to my parents/boss/friend', 'help me tell them I'm [gay/trans/bi/etc.]', 'rehearse this conversation with me', or is planning any identity disclosure. Produces an opener, a rehearsal against realistic reactions, and a safety plan. Safety and the user's autonomy come first — it never pushes anyone to come out."
Coming Out Rehearsal Skill
Coming out is not one conversation — it's a different conversation with every person,
each with its own stakes, and the internet's "just be brave" advice ignores that some
disclosures carry real risk: housing, money, physical safety, a job. This skill treats
it seriously: help decide whether, when, and to whom is right for the user (never
pushing), craft the words for this specific person, rehearse against the reactions
that actually happen, and — for the harder rooms — build a safety plan first. The
user is always in charge; coming out is theirs to do, on their timeline, or not.
What This Skill Produces
A who/when/whether check (only if wanted): a clear-eyed look at readiness,
timing, and dependency/safety factors — with the firm stance that not coming out,
or waiting, is a completely valid choice
An opener and script tuned to this person: how to start, what to say, what to
leave out, anticipating their frame of reference
A rehearsal: the assistant plays the person at the honesty level requested
(the supportive-but-clumsy, the "are you sure?", the silence, the hostile), then
debriefs out of character — simulator DNA on a tender conversation
A safety plan where risk is real: for disclosures that could threaten housing,
finances, or physical safety — what to secure first, having support lined up, an
exit, and the option to delay
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
Who they want to tell, the relationship, and what they know of that person's likely
reaction (past comments, values, other people they've reacted to)
What the user is disclosing and what they want from the conversation (to be known?
accepted? just on the record?)
The honest risk picture: do they depend on this person for housing, money, safety?
are they a minor? is there any history of hostility?
Whether they want to rehearse the hard version or the hopeful one
Framework
Autonomy and safety before anything. The first job is not to script — it's to
make sure this is the user's own choice and that they've clocked the real risks.
If they depend on the person for shelter/money/safety, or if there's a hostility
history, the skill surfaces that plainly and helps weigh timing, never nudging
toward disclosure. "You don't owe anyone this, and later is allowed" is stated.
Write to their frame, not yours. The opener meets the person where they are:
a parent who's never thought about it needs a different entry than a progressive
friend. Simple, direct, and leading with the relationship ("I want to tell you
something because I trust you") tends to land better than a manifesto.
Rehearse the real reactions. People rarely react with the movie hug or the
movie disaster; more often it's clumsy love, anxious questions ("is this a phase?",
"did we do something?"), stunned silence, or bargaining. The assistant plays it
believably at the user's chosen intensity, then debriefs: what escalated, what to
let sit, the lines to keep, and that the first reaction is often not the final one
(people need time; a bad first minute isn't the verdict).
Plan the hard rooms for safety, not persuasion. Where risk is real: secure
what matters first (somewhere to stay, access to your own money/documents,
important accounts), line up a support person to be reachable, plan the exit and
the immediate-after, and keep the option to not do it now. Safety infrastructure
is the deliverable here, more than the script.
Prepare for the after, either way. A plan for if it goes well (what you want
next — pronouns, who else, boundaries) and if it doesn't (who you'll go to, the
grounding reminder that their reaction is about them, and that support communities
exist). The conversation is a moment; the after is where the user lives.
Output Format
## First — is this your choice, and is it safe?
[Autonomy check · the honest risk read · "waiting or not doing it is valid"]
## Your opener (for THIS person)
[How to start, tuned to their frame · what to include/leave out]
## Rehearsal
[In-character exchange at the chosen intensity · — out of character — · debrief:
escalators, keep-lines, "first reaction ≠ final"]
## Safety plan (if risk is real)
[Secure first: housing / money / documents / accounts · support person on call ·
exit & immediate-after · permission to delay]
## The after
[If it goes well: … · if it doesn't: who you go to, the grounding truth, community]
Quality Checks
Autonomy and safety are handled first; the skill never pressures toward
disclosure and states that waiting/not-doing is valid
Where the user flagged dependency or hostility risk, a concrete safety plan
exists (housing/money/documents/support/exit)
The rehearsal reactions are realistically clumsy/mixed, not cartoon
accept-or-reject, and the debrief notes first ≠ final
The opener is tuned to the specific person's frame of reference
There's an after-plan for both outcomes, including where to turn if it's bad
Anti-Patterns
Do not push, guilt, or imply the user "should" come out — it's theirs to choose,
on their timeline, or never
Do not minimize real risk to serve an uplifting arc — for minors or dependents
especially, safety planning outranks the script
Do not script the other person into accepting — the rehearsal must be able to go
badly, because reality can
Do not treat this as therapy or crisis care — if the user is in danger or in
crisis, point to affirming crisis/support resources and stop there
Do not out anyone or advise outing a third party — this is the user's own
disclosure only
Related
[[the-visa-interview]] and [[salary-negotiation]] share the rehearsal engine;
[[faith-transition-companion]] when family and faith are entangled; [[aging-parent-talks]]
for other high-stakes family conversations; [[name-change-navigator]] for the logistics
that may follow.