Draft a clinical trial protocol synopsis with the elements regulators and IRBs expect. Use when asked to write a clinical trial protocol, a study protocol synopsis, a trial design, or to structure endpoints/eligibility/statistics for an interventional study. Produces a structured protocol synopsis — objectives, design, population with eligibility, interventions, endpoints, statistics, and safety/ethics — for expert review. (For non-clinical/UX research, use research-protocol.)
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use clinical-trial-protocol to draft a clinical-trial protocol synopsis for [intervention, condition, and phase], covering design, eligibility, comparator, one primary endpoint, analysis, safety, and ethics; label assumptions and placeholders for expert confirmation. This is a draft for qualified investigator, statistician, and IRB/regulatory review, not sign-off.
Required inputs
[intervention, condition, and phase]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: clinical-trial-protocoldescription: "Draft a clinical trial protocol synopsis with the elements regulators and IRBs expect. Use when asked to write a clinical trial protocol, a study protocol synopsis, a trial design, or to structure endpoints/eligibility/statistics for an interventional study. Produces a structured protocol synopsis — objectives, design, population with eligibility, interventions, endpoints, statistics, and safety/ethics — for expert review. (For non-clinical/UX research, use research-protocol.)"
Clinical Trial Protocol Skill
A clinical trial protocol stands or falls on a few linked decisions: a clear objective, a design that can answer
it, endpoints that measure it, eligibility that defines who's studied, and a statistical plan that can detect the
effect. This skill drafts a protocol synopsis that makes those decisions explicit and internally consistent, in
the structure IRBs/ethics committees and regulators expect. (For a general academic or UX study, use
research-protocol.)
Safety & compliance note: this is a drafting aid for expert review, not regulatory, medical, or
statistical sign-off. Real trials require qualified investigators, a statistician, and IRB/ethics and
regulatory approval (e.g. GCP, ICH, local law). Do not invent efficacy/safety data; mark assumptions for the
study team to set.
Working from a brief
Given "a phase II trial of drug X for condition Y", produce the full synopsis anyway — infer a defensible
design, endpoints, and eligibility appropriate to the phase and condition, and clearly label every inferred
choice as a draft assumption for the study team and statistician to confirm. Never fabricate prior data or
effect sizes; state them as placeholders to be set.
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else infer and label as draft):
Intervention & condition — what's being studied, in whom, and the phase.
Objective / question — the primary question the trial must answer.
Comparator — placebo, standard of care, or active control; and blinding.
Outcome of interest — how benefit (and harm) will be measured.
Constraints — known population, setting, and any regulatory context.
Output Format
Clinical Trial Protocol Synopsis: [title]
1. Background & rationale — the problem, prior evidence (mark placeholders), and why this trial.
2. Objectives — primary and secondary, each as a precise, testable statement.
3. Design — phase, type (RCT, etc.), allocation/randomisation, blinding, arms, and duration.
4. Population — setting, and explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria.
5. Interventions — the intervention and comparator: dose/regimen, administration, and concomitant rules.
6. Endpoints — primary endpoint (one, tied to the primary objective), secondary endpoints, and how/when each is measured.
7. Statistical considerations — analysis populations, the primary analysis, and a sample-size basis (with assumptions flagged for the statistician).
8. Safety — adverse-event definitions, monitoring/reporting, stopping rules, and any DSMB.
9. Ethics & conduct — informed consent, IRB/ethics approval, data integrity, and GCP adherence.
Close with assumptions to confirm and a reminder that a qualified investigator and statistician must own the final protocol.
Quality Checks
The primary objective, primary endpoint, and primary analysis are aligned and consistent
There is exactly one primary endpoint, clearly measurable and time-anchored
Inclusion/exclusion criteria are explicit and operationally checkable
Sample-size basis is stated with its assumptions flagged for the statistician
Safety monitoring, reporting, and stopping rules are present
Ethics/consent/IRB and GCP elements are included; no efficacy/safety data is invented
Anti-Patterns
Do not invent prior efficacy/safety data or effect sizes — mark them as placeholders to be set
Do not list multiple "primary" endpoints — pick one and demote the rest to secondary
Do not let objective, endpoint, and analysis drift apart — they must answer the same question
Do not present this as regulatory/statistical sign-off — it's a draft for expert review
Do not omit safety monitoring and stopping rules — a protocol without them isn't approvable
Based On
Clinical research practice — objective-endpoint-analysis alignment, explicit eligibility, sample-size justification, and ICH-GCP safety/ethics structure.
Example Trigger Phrases
"Write a clinical trial protocol."
"Draft a study protocol synopsis."
"Design the trial."
"Structure endpoints, eligibility and statistics for an interventional study."
clinical-trial-protocol by mohitagw15856 · The Skill Leaderboard