architecture-diagram

name: architecture-diagramdescription: "Diagram a system or technical architecture — services, data stores, and how they connect. Use when asked to draw an architecture, show how components fit together, map a system/data flow, or visualize services and dependencies. Produces a ready-to-render Mermaid diagram with grouped subgraphs (renders live, exportable as PNG/SVG) plus a component legend and notes."

Architecture Diagram Skill

"How does the system fit together?" is best answered with a picture. This skill turns a described system into a clean Mermaid architecture diagram — clients, services, data stores, and third parties, grouped into logical layers with labelled connections (sync vs async, protocols) — not an undifferentiated blob of boxes.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

• The components — services, apps, databases, queues, external APIs.
• How they connect — who calls whom; sync (HTTP/gRPC) vs async (queue/event); data flow direction.
• Logical groupings — frontend / backend / data / third-party, or by team/domain.
• Focus — the whole system or one slice (e.g. just the checkout path).

Output Format

[System name] — architecture

One line on what the diagram covers and its boundary.

flowchart LR
    subgraph Client
        Web[Web app]
        Mobile[Mobile app]
    end
    subgraph Backend
        API[API gateway]
        Svc[Order service]
    end
    subgraph Data
        DB[(Postgres)]
        Cache[(Redis)]
    end
    Web --> API
    Mobile --> API
    API --> Svc
    Svc --> DB
    Svc -.async.-> Queue[[Event bus]]
    Svc --> Cache

Component legend — one line per non-obvious component (what it is, why it's there).

Notes — trust boundaries, single points of failure, sync vs async (-.-> = async), anything to revisit.

Mermaid Rules (so it renders)

• Use flowchart LR (or TD) with subgraph Name ... end for logical layers.
• Databases/stores read well as [(name)]; queues/buses as [[name]].
• Solid arrows --> for synchronous calls, dotted -.label.-> for async/events.
• Short node labels; keep IDs unique and simple. No parentheses/quotes inside labels.

Quality Checks

• Components are grouped into meaningful layers (subgraphs), not one flat pile
• Connection direction reflects who calls whom; async vs sync is distinguished
• Data stores and external/third-party systems are visually distinct from services
• The legend explains anything non-obvious; trust boundaries / SPOFs are noted
• The Mermaid block renders without edits

Anti-Patterns

• Do not draw every box the same with undifferentiated arrows — show layers and connection types
• Do not omit data stores or external dependencies — they're usually where the risk lives
• Do not blur sync and async — they have very different failure modes
• Do not cram the entire system when the ask is one slice — match the requested focus
• Do not break Mermaid with special characters in labels

Based On

Architecture diagramming (C4-style grouping, logical layers, sync/async edges), expressed as renderable Mermaid.

Example Trigger Phrases

• "Draw an architecture."
• "Show how components fit together."
• "Map a system/data flow."
• "Visualize services and dependencies."