Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.
Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use academic-cv to build a tailored academic CV for [post and country] in [field and citation style] from [academic record], including field-appropriate section order, consistent publications, and a two-page version if appropriate.
Required inputs
[post and country]
[field and citation style]
[academic record]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: academic-cvdescription: "Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked."version: 1.0.0
Academic CV
An academic CV is a complete record, not a summary. Hiring committees look for the same things in a fixed order: research, funding, teaching, service. Length is expected; inconsistency is not. This skill builds the record, orders it for the field and the post, and formats every citation the same way.
Part of the pm-cv bundle.
What This Skill Produces
The full academic CV
A section order for the field and post type, with the reason
A publications list in one citation style, with the person's name in bold
A short version (two pages) for fellowships or industry research roles, when asked
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
The post: lectureship or assistant professor, postdoc, research fellow, industry research, and the institution's country
The field, because conventions differ (author order, conference versus journal weight)
The record: publications, grants, teaching, supervision, talks, service, awards
The citation style the field uses, or permission to choose the common one
Framework
Typical order (adjust by field and post):
Contact and current position
Research interests (two lines)
Education, with thesis title and supervisor
Appointments
Publications, split: peer-reviewed journal articles; conference papers; books and chapters; preprints and under review (labelled as such)
Grants and funding: funder, title, role, amount, years
Awards and fellowships
Teaching: courses, level, role, student numbers
Supervision: students, level, status
Invited talks and conference presentations
Service: reviewing, committees, organising
Public engagement and impact, where the system values it
References, if the country expects them on the CV
Rules:
Reverse chronological within each section.
One citation style throughout. The person's name in bold. Equal-contribution marks explained once.
"Under review" and "in preparation" are labelled honestly and never listed as published.
For computer science and similar fields, top conferences may outrank journals; put them first.
Output Format
Academic CV: [name], [post]
1. The CV2. Section order and why3. Citation check: inconsistencies found and fixed
4. Short version (if asked)
Quality Checks
Every publication uses the same citation style
Unpublished work is labelled as under review or in preparation
Grants show the person's role (principal investigator, co-investigator, named researcher)
Section order fits the field and post
Nothing is listed that the person did not provide
Anti-Patterns
Mixing citation styles. Committees notice and read it as carelessness.
Inflating status. A submitted paper is not "forthcoming".
Hiding teaching for a teaching-heavy post, or hiding research for a research post.
Using the full CV for industry. Industry research roles want the short version.
Example Trigger Phrases
"Update my academic CV for a lectureship application in the UK."
"Format my publications list properly."
"I'm applying for a postdoc. Help me order my CV."
"Turn my academic CV into a two-page version for an industry research role."