← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

statute-briefer-seth-chandler

Skill file skills/statute-briefer-seth-chandler/SKILL.md in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Read the publisher’s upstream source.

Description awaits a fresh source check.

Published by lawve-ai ↗lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

Try your first task

statute-briefer

Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.

Use statute-briefer to prepare a scenario-driven MAPS + RULES brief of [statutory text] applied to [scenario], labeling missing facts and relying only on the text provided.

Required inputs

  • [statutory text]
  • [scenario]

User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗

SKILL.md

name: statute-brieferdescription: >  Brief statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework. Use when  briefing statutes, analyzing legislative text, mapping statutory structure,  extracting rule-modules from provisions, applying statutes to scenarios, or any  statutory analysis task. Triggers include "brief this statute," "analyze this Act,"  "map the statute," "apply [statute] to [scenario]," "what are the elements of  [provision]," "statutory analysis," or references to codified sections (such as  42 U.S.C. sections or Texas Health & Safety Code). Supports two modes -  (A) text-only briefing for structural analysis, and (B) scenario-driven briefing  that applies statutory provisions to specific facts.

Statute Briefer (MAPS + RULES)

Produce structured statute/Act briefs that (a) map the architecture of the entire statute/Act and (b) express operative provisions as rule-modules. Optionally apply provisions to scenarios with verbatim quotations.

Input Modes

Mode A: Text-only briefing

  • Required: Statutory text (or delimited excerpt)
  • Optional: Citation info, version type (enacted/codified/amendment), length constraint (short/standard/long)

Mode B: Scenario-driven briefing

  • Required: Statutory text + scenario description
  • Optional: Decision posture (advice/compliance/litigation), length constraint

If citation/version missing, label brief as "text-as-provided" without recency claims.

Output Structure

Every brief produces two layers. In Mode B, prepend the Scenario Module.

Scenario Module (Mode B only)

See references/scenario-template.md for detailed template.

Six components:

  1. Scenario synopsis – Legally salient facts only
  2. Issues framed as statutory questions – Frame disputes as statutory interpretation questions
  3. Relevant excerpts (verbatim) – Block-quoted text with pinpoint cites; include adjacent definitions/exceptions
  4. Application map (statute-to-facts) – For each issue: elements met, unclear, or disputed; identify missing facts
  5. Context map (where excerpts live) – Title/Chapter/Section path for each excerpt
  6. Not used but structurally important – Major Act components not triggered by scenario

MAPS (System-Level Map)

Five components:

  1. Citation and text status – Citation block or "citation not provided"; note if partial text
  2. Purpose – Quote express purpose/findings if present (with cite); otherwise label as inference
  3. Structure map (entire Act) – Hierarchical outline with functional labels ("definitions," "prohibition," "enforcement," etc.); for large statutes, provide major-divisions overview plus zoomed detail
  4. Scope and coverage – Covered actors, conduct, geography, time, jurisdictional hooks, explicit exclusions
  5. Definitions and interpretive rules – Defined terms index; interpretive provisions; cross-references

RULES (Operational Modules)

For each major operative provision (or scenario-relevant provisions), produce a rule-module.

See references/rule-module-template.md for detailed template.

Rule-Module required fields:

  1. Provision – Pinpoint cite
  2. Trigger conditions (elements) – What activates the provision
  3. Legal effect – Command / permission / prohibition / entitlement
  4. Exceptions / defenses / safe harbors – Carve-outs from the rule
  5. Procedure / decision-maker – Deadlines, notice, standards
  6. Consequences – Penalties, remedies, invalidity, loss of benefits
  7. Forum / enforcer – Agency, court, private plaintiff
  8. Interaction rules – Preemption/savings, severability, effective date, cross-references

Mandatory Constraints

Verbatim Discipline

  • Never invent statutory language
  • Mark all quotations explicitly with pinpoint cites
  • If text is missing, say so and proceed with what is provided

Cross-Reference Discipline

  • When statute defines a term used in operative provision, incorporate that definition
  • Flag external cross-references: "cross-reference not included in provided materials"

Separation of Layers

  • Keep "Quoted Text" separate from "Explanation/Translation"
  • Use block quotes or clear markers

No Premature Narrowing

  • Even in scenario mode, include MAPS structure map at major-division level

Selection Rules

Mode A (no scenario): Major operative provisions = primary prohibitions/requirements/entitlements + enforcement/remedies + key definitions + preemption/savings/severability/venue

Mode B (with scenario): Prioritize provisions governing scenario issues + conditioning definitions/enforcement/exceptions. Still include full structure map.

Length Control

ConstraintStructure MapRule-ModulesDefinitions
ShortSpine outline onlyMost relevant onlyKey scope terms only
StandardMajor divisions completeCore operative provisionsTerms affecting scope
LongFull detailAll operative provisionsComprehensive index

Uncertainty Handling

  • Insufficient facts → Label "Fact needed: [specific missing fact]"
  • Partial statute → Label "based on provided excerpt only"
  • Never fill in absent provisions

Exact Headings (for parsing)

Scenario Module
  Scenario synopsis
  Issues framed as statutory questions
  Relevant excerpts (verbatim)
  Application map (statute-to-facts)
  Context map (where excerpts live)
  Not used but structurally important

MAPS
  Citation and text status
  Purpose
  Structure map (entire Act)
  Scope and coverage
  Definitions and interpretive rules

RULES
  Rule-Module: [Provision cite]

Boundaries

  • Briefs statutes and legislative Acts only
  • No policy commentary unless asked
  • No grading or pedagogy commentary
  • No generating new statutory text
  • No case citations unless explicitly requested; may note "interpretive pressure points" as ambiguity flags