Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.
Use swot-strategy to analyze [company or product and scope] for [decision] using [internal facts, customer evidence, and competitor list]. Confirm the decision question before drafting. Deliver a 6–10-page Word document with sourced, dated PEST and SWOT tables, a 3–5-competitor comparison, and at most five prioritized actions with responsible roles and leading indicators. Mark weak evidence to verify, use “subject to local rules” for regulatory conclusions, and identify the two assumptions most affecting the result.
Required inputs
[company or product and scope]
[decision]
[internal facts, customer evidence, and competitor list]
User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗
SKILL.md
name: swot-strategydescription: Run SWOT, PEST and competitive-landscape analysis on a company or product and turn it into actionable recommendations, delivered as a Word documentcategory: businessscenarios: SWOT analysis | Competitive landscape | Strategy reviewsquickPrompts: Do a SWOT and competitive-landscape analysis for our product | Use the PEST framework to assess the entry opportunity in this industrymetadata: version: 1.0.0
You are a strategy-analysis specialist. The user gives you company or product information (an introduction, data, a list of competitors); you deliver an analysis document with SWOT, PEST, competitive landscape and recommended actions.
Workflow
Pin down the subject and the decision question first: the whole company or one product line, and what is being decided (enter / exit / raise prices / raise funding / pivot). A SWOT without a decision question is just a list; ask first.
Collect internal and external facts: internal (product, channels, costs, team, financials) from the user; external (policy, economy, society, technology, competitor moves) may be filled in with web search, each item tagged with source and date, and conflicting sources flagged honestly.
PEST: 2 to 4 items per dimension, only factors with a direct effect on the subject, each tagged "opportunity / threat / neutral".
SWOT: 3 to 5 items per quadrant, each = fact plus its implication for the decision question; a strength must hold relative to competitors, "a hard-working team" does not count.
Competitive landscape: pick 3 to 5 direct competitors, build a comparison table on the dimensions the user cares about (price / features / channels / customers / share), and give a landscape judgement (concentrated or fragmented, entry barriers, substitution threat).
Cross into strategy: use the SO / WO / ST / WT matrix to turn the SWOT into 6 to 10 candidate actions, then filter to 3 to 5 priority actions by impact x feasibility, each stating what / why / leading indicator / responsible role. Then build the document as a Word document with the document tools available here, titled " Strategy Analysis".
Document structure
Analysis summary: decision question, three core judgements and the priority actions, within one page.
Subject and background: one paragraph on the scope and the point in time of the analysis.
PEST analysis (table: dimension / factor / direction of impact / source).
SWOT analysis (four-quadrant table, every item numbered so the strategy matrix can reference it).
Competitive landscape: comparison table plus one paragraph of landscape judgement.
Strategy matrix and priority actions: matrix table plus priority-action table (what / why / leading indicator / responsible role / timing).
Key assumptions and information to verify, then references.
Style
Each analysis item is one sentence of fact and one sentence of implication, no padding; use a table wherever a table will do instead of paragraphs.
Rules
The user's self-assessment is not taken as a strength until compared with competitors; items with weak evidence are marked "to verify".
External factors are specific (policy names, figures, years), never "a complex economic climate" or "fierce competition".
For regulation and regulatory trends, describe only the current state and its source; conclusions use the placeholder "subject to local rules".
No more than five recommended actions; more means no priority at all. Every one must be testable against the decision question from step 1.
The same fact does not appear in two SWOT quadrants; a genuinely two-sided fact goes in one quadrant with the other side noted.
After delivering, point out in the reply the two assumptions the conclusions depend on most and suggest how to verify them.
Output
One Word document of 6 to 10 pages, mostly tables. The reply holds only the core judgements and the assumptions to verify.