Talk
Create, audit, or compile presentations (Beamer or Quarto RevealJS).
Input: $ARGUMENTS — mode and format/path.
Modes
/talk create [format] — Create Beamer Talk
/talk create [format] --quarto — Create Quarto RevealJS Talk
Generate a presentation from the paper.
Agents: Storyteller (creator) → storyteller-critic (reviewer)
Format Constraints
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Arguments
- Format (required):
job-market | seminar | short | lightning
- Paper path (optional): defaults to
paper/main.tex
- Engine: Beamer (default) or Quarto RevealJS (
--quarto)
- If no format specified, ask the user.
Step 2: Dispatch Storyteller
Read the paper and extract: research question, identification strategy, main result, secondary results, robustness checks, key figures/tables, institutional background. Design narrative arc for the chosen format. Build the slide file with shared preamble if available.
The Storyteller follows these design principles:
- One idea per slide — never cram two concepts onto one frame
- Figures over tables; tables in backup — audiences absorb figures instantly; regression tables belong in backup slides where referees can inspect them during Q&A
- Build tension — motivation → question → method → findings → implications
- Transition slides between major sections — signal where the talk is going
- All claims must appear in the paper — the paper is the single source of truth; never add results or claims that are not in the manuscript
Compile with XeLaTeX (Beamer) or quarto render (Quarto).
Save to paper/talks/[format]_talk.tex (Beamer) or paper/quarto/[format]_talk.qmd (Quarto).
Step 3: Dispatch Storyteller-Critic
After the Storyteller returns, dispatch the storyteller-critic to review across 5 categories:
Score as advisory (non-blocking). Save report to quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md.
Step 4: Fix Critical Issues
If the storyteller-critic finds Critical issues (compilation failures, content not in paper):
- Re-dispatch Storyteller with specific fixes (max 3 rounds per three-strikes rule)
- Re-run storyteller-critic to verify
Step 5: Present Results
Report to the user:
- Generated file path
- Slide count and format compliance
- Storyteller-critic score (advisory, non-blocking)
- TODO items (missing figures, tables not yet generated)
/talk audit [file] — Visual Audit
Check existing slides for layout issues.
Run visual quality checks:
- Text overflow on any slide
- Font sizes (>= 10pt for projection)
- Table readability
- Figure sizing and labels
- Consistent formatting
- Overfull hbox warnings
/talk compile [file] — Compile Talk
3-pass XeLaTeX compilation for Beamer:
cd paper/talks && TEXINPUTS=../preambles:$TEXINPUTS xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode [file]
For Quarto:
cd paper/quarto && quarto render [file]
Principles
- Paper is authoritative. Every claim must appear in the paper.
- Figures over tables. Audiences absorb figures instantly. Put regression tables in backup slides for Q&A.
- Less is more. Especially for short and lightning formats — ruthlessly cut.
- One idea per slide. If you need a second point, make a second slide.
- Audience calibration. Job market = demonstrate rigor and command of the literature. Seminar = sell the interesting result. Short = method and key finding. Lightning = sell the idea in one breath.
- Advisory scoring. Talk scores don't block commits.
- Worker-critic pairing. Storyteller creates, storyteller-critic critiques. Never skip the review.