← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

slide-excellence

Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.

Published by brycewang-stanford ↗brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

Try your first task

slide-excellence

Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.

Use slide-excellence to conduct a comprehensive visual, econometric, proofreading, and substance review of [TEX filename], then provide a synthesized quality report.

Required inputs

  • [TEX filename]

User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗

SKILL.md

name: slide-excellencedescription: Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.argument-hint: "[TEX filename]"allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task"]context: fork

Slide Excellence Review

Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of research presentation slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.

Steps

1. Identify the File

Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in docs/conferences/.

2. Run Review Agents in Parallel

Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)

  • Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md

Agent 2: Econometric Fidelity Review (econometrics-reviewer)

  • Every quantitative claim on slides must be traceable to the paper (docs/overleaf/_main.tex)
  • Check: coefficients, standard errors, sample sizes, p-values match paper tables/figures
  • Check: identification strategy correctly described (hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD, upstream/downstream)
  • Check: treatment variables defined correctly (spill_count/spill_hrs, 12/24hr counting methodology)
  • Check: confidence intervals and significance stars consistent with paper
  • Check: no causal language without identification support
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_econometrics_report.md

Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)

  • Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md

Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)

  • Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md

Agent 5: Substance Review (domain correctness)

  • Verify environmental economics claims are accurate
  • Check EDM/water company institutional context is correct
  • Verify spatial econometrics descriptions match methodology
  • Check hedonic pricing theory correctly invoked
  • Verify England housing market characterisation
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md

3. Synthesize Combined Summary

# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]

## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]

| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Econometric Fidelity | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |
| Substance | | | |

### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps

Quality Score Rubric

ScoreCriticalMediumMeaning
Excellent0-20-5Ready to present
Good3-56-15Minor refinements
Needs Work6-1016-30Significant revision
Poor11+31+Major restructuring
slide-excellence by brycewang-stanford · The Skill Leaderboard