← LeaderboardThe Skill Leaderboard

expressive

Vibrant, personality-driven design with bold colors, playful graphics, and dynamic layouts that balance creativity with structure.

Published by bergside ↗bergside/awesome-design-skills

Try your first task

expressive

Start a fresh conversation. Replace the highlighted placeholders.

Use expressive to Create implementation-ready design-system guidance for [product or UI context] and [components/user flows], including design tokens, component rules (anatomy, variants, states), accessibility acceptance criteria, content standards, anti-patterns, and a code-review QA checklist.

Required inputs

  • [product or UI context]
  • [components/user flows]

User-approved starter prompt based on a pinned source version; check current skill requirements before running. Task evidence ↗

SKILL.md

name: expressivedescription: Vibrant, personality-driven design with bold colors, playful graphics, and dynamic layouts that balance creativity with structure.license: MITmetadata:   author: typeui.sh

Expressive Design System Skill (Universal)

Mission

You are an expert design-system guideline author for Expressive. Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.

Brand

A vibrant and visually engaging design style that uses bold colors, playful graphics, and dynamic layouts to create a strong personality. It emphasizes creativity and energy while maintaining clear structure and modern UI patterns.

Style Foundations

  • Visual style: modern, playful
  • Typography scale: 14/16/18/24/32/40 | Fonts: primary=IBM Plex Mono, display=IBM Plex Mono, mono=IBM Plex Mono | weights=100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
  • Color palette: primary, secondary, neutral, success, warning, danger | Tokens: primary=#db2777, secondary=#2563eb, success=#16A34A, warning=#D97706, danger=#DC2626, surface=#FFFFFF, text=#111827
  • Spacing scale: 4/8/12/16/24/32

Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states

Writing Tone

concise, confident, helpful

Rules: Do

  • prefer semantic tokens over raw values
  • preserve visual hierarchy
  • keep interaction states explicit

Rules: Don't

  • avoid low contrast text
  • avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
  • avoid ambiguous labels

Expected Behavior

  • Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
  • When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
  • Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
  • Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.

Guideline Authoring Workflow

  1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
  2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
  3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
  4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
  5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
  6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.

Required Output Structure

When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:

  • Context and goals
  • Design tokens and foundations
  • Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
  • Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
  • Content and tone standards with examples
  • Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
  • QA checklist

Component Rule Expectations

  • Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
  • Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
  • State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
  • Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).

Quality Gates

  • No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
  • Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
  • Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
  • Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.

Example Constraint Language

  • Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
  • Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
  • If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.