Last commit on August 20, 2026·Created on July 14, 2026
TobiasLee/Rebuttal-Skill
“A structured framework for diagnosing peer-review concerns and planning academic rebuttals.”
Combined rank
#512
across all skills
Stars
464
7d change unavailable
Forks
20
Watchers
1
Traction scoreGitHub stars can be faked, so popularity alone can be misleading. Traction Score looks for broader signs of real attention, adoption, and active maintenance.
TL;DR
This skill assists researchers in navigating the peer-review process by triaging reviewer comments and identifying decision-critical doubts. It helps authors determine if a rebuttal is viable and ranks the experiments or clarifications most likely to influence a final acceptance decision.
Once evidence is gathered, the tool generates draft response materials following a direct answer and evidence-based structure. These drafts serve as internal working documents for the author to refine, ensuring all claims remain grounded in verified manuscript data.
WHO IT'S FOR
Academic researchers
diagnose reviewer concerns and plan rebuttal experiments
PhD students
prepare evidence-grounded response drafts for review
NLP and AI researchers
navigate venue-specific generative AI disclosure policies
Principal Investigators
assess the viability of paper rebuttals
Compatible AgentsThe repository documents support for these agents. The skills may also work with other agents that can load SKILL.md files, but they may need some setup or small changes.
Want to install it?
Manual CopyRepository instructions