←Leaderboard/Research/Rebuttal-Skill
Last commit on August 20, 2026·Created on July 14, 2026

TobiasLee/Rebuttal-Skill

“A structured framework for diagnosing peer-review concerns and planning academic rebuttals.”
Combined rank
#561
across all skills
In Research
#24
category rank
Stars
480
+0.2% in last 7d
Forks
21
0.0% in last 7d
Watchers
1
0.0% in last 7d
Traction scoreGitHub stars can be faked, so popularity alone can be misleading. Traction Score looks for broader signs of recent attention, adoption, and active maintenance.
TL;DR

This skill assists researchers in navigating the peer-review process by triaging reviewer comments and identifying decision-critical doubts. It helps authors determine if a rebuttal is viable and ranks the experiments or clarifications most likely to influence a final acceptance decision.

Once evidence is gathered, the tool generates draft response materials following a direct answer and evidence-based structure. These drafts serve as internal working documents for the author to refine, ensuring all claims remain grounded in verified manuscript data.

WHO IT'S FOR
Academic researchers
diagnose reviewer concerns and plan rebuttal experiments
PhD students
prepare evidence-grounded response drafts for review
NLP and AI researchers
navigate venue-specific generative AI disclosure policies
Principal Investigators
assess the viability of paper rebuttals
Repository contents

1 skill file

Compatible AgentsThe repository documents support for these agents. The skills may also work with other agents that can load SKILL.md files, but they may need some setup or small changes.

Use this skill

Follow the documented setup, then try a first task.

See the repository for installation instructions.

Open repository instructions ↗

Give it something to do.

Suggested first task

Triage reviews and prioritize rebuttal experiments

Uses academic-rebuttal

  • Current venue and score scale, including the borderline score if known
  • Current venue generative-assistance policy text or link
  • Deadline, available compute, and author bandwidth
  • Paper abstract
  • All review texts, reviewer scores, and confidence ratings

Make sure academic-rebuttal is installed in your agent before trying this task.

Use the academic-rebuttal skill to analyze this paper's reviews before drafting a rebuttal.

Venue and score scale: [venue, scale, and borderline score if known]
Current venue generative-assistance policy: [policy text or link]
Deadline and resources: [time remaining, available compute, and author bandwidth]
Paper abstract: [abstract]
Reviews, reviewer scores, and confidence ratings: [reviews, scores, and confidences]

First check the venue's current generative-assistance policy. Then assess whether a rebuttal is worthwhile, identify the likely concern behind each review comment while clearly flagging uncertain interpretations, and produce a prioritized P0–P3 experiment, analysis, and clarification plan. Do not draft a submission-ready rebuttal or fabricate results, citations, reviewer intent, or manuscript locations. Do not include confidential chair-only notes, undisclosed meta-reviews, or reviewer identities.
SKILL.md ↗ · Checked Oct 19, 2026README.md ↗ · Checked Oct 19, 2026