Triage reviews and prioritize rebuttal experiments
Uses academic-rebuttal
- Current venue and score scale, including the borderline score if known
- Current venue generative-assistance policy text or link
- Deadline, available compute, and author bandwidth
- Paper abstract
- All review texts, reviewer scores, and confidence ratings
Make sure academic-rebuttal is installed in your agent before trying this task.
Use the academic-rebuttal skill to analyze this paper's reviews before drafting a rebuttal. Venue and score scale: [venue, scale, and borderline score if known] Current venue generative-assistance policy: [policy text or link] Deadline and resources: [time remaining, available compute, and author bandwidth] Paper abstract: [abstract] Reviews, reviewer scores, and confidence ratings: [reviews, scores, and confidences] First check the venue's current generative-assistance policy. Then assess whether a rebuttal is worthwhile, identify the likely concern behind each review comment while clearly flagging uncertain interpretations, and produce a prioritized P0–P3 experiment, analysis, and clarification plan. Do not draft a submission-ready rebuttal or fabricate results, citations, reviewer intent, or manuscript locations. Do not include confidential chair-only notes, undisclosed meta-reviews, or reviewer identities.
